Smoke-free laws have generated a lot of uncertainty for the hoteliers.
Some could enable areas for smokers and nonsmokers, yes with a high cost of local reform, but the smaller bars in the hard fought decision of whether to make a smoking bar or fumadores.Es not true that this law came in his worst moment, sales began to fall and through the power consumed snuff in their business, many restaurateurs were able to cover its costs.
Now after all this, make a new law to decide not to allow smoking in any place of leisure.
What do you think all these restaurants and bars, which enabled two areas and they spent much of benefits that could have gone for something else, such reform?
What has not reviewed the government have been the so-called indirect costs that can have this reform, we must to realize not only what we have before us but also the backdrop that this entails: 1.What
which is: What will be happy to nonsmokers with this reform (myself included in the group). 2.The measures laid
not seen: There are thousands of businesses that live off the snuff (direct and indirect) and thus thousands of workers and families so that consumed by the salary provided by tobacco companies and derivatives.
Sales of snuff lower your level of sales, this means that companies sell less, so will the need to produce less, thus made a reduction of its workforce and lay off workers.
These workers will receive a salary which will lower their consumption in other companies and businesses (bars, supermarkets, etc). With this we enter a vicious circle of poverty, Not to mention that this infringes on individual freedom of each person to decide to smoke or not smoke.
0 comments:
Post a Comment